Tell the U.S. Supreme Court to Condemn NOM’s Abhorrent Tactics in Iowa

The National Organization for Marriage (NOM) set its political bulls-eye on three Iowa Supreme Court justices who were part of the unanimous 2009 decision which found that same-sex couples have a constitutional right to marry. All three lost on Election Day. This was a cruel and calculated warning shot to judges nationwide: Either rule according to our radical, anti-gay ideology or we’ll come get you. Please add your name to our open letter calling on U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts to condemn NOM and its allies – and declare that judges must not be intimidated into ruling based on biased special-interest politics. After you sign the letter, you’ll be able to share this on Facebook and Twitter. Dear Chief Justice John Roberts, As you know, three of Iowa’s Supreme Court justices lost their seats last week in the judicial retention election. All three were aggressively targeted by a cynical political campaign run by the Washington, D.C.-based National Organization for Marriage (NOM) and its allies because of a single, unanimous ruling. In 2009, the full court ruled that same-sex couples have a constitutional right to marry in Iowa. You might also know that the three justices, who faced a barrage of television ads, refused to mount a counter attack because of the message it might send to litigants who appear before them. The judicial retention election, established in 1962, was designed to address gross misconduct, not punish judges for one ruling. In fact, only four other judges have lost their seats and, until last Tuesday, none of them from the state’s highest court. NOM’s non-stop campaign made voters believe that ousting the justices would destroy same-sex marriage in Iowa. Of course, same-sex marriage remains law in Iowa and will not be impacted by whomever the new governor selects for the bench. In fact, NOM admits its Iowa campaign had nothing to do with Iowa. This one judicial retention election, the organization said, would “send a clear signal to the Supreme Court and other judges that they don’t have the right to make up the law out of thin air. If the people of Iowa… remove these judges, there will be reverberations throughout the country all the way to the United States Supreme Court.” This is clear intimidation meant to be heard hundreds and thousands of miles away from Waterloo, Des Moines or Dubuque. It’s meant to shatter judicial independence everywhere. The Iowa State Bar Association had determined that each of the three justices was “well qualified,” meaning all three “avoid undue personal observations or criticisms [and they] decide cases on the basis of applicable law and fact, not affected by outside influence.” This was nothing short of a political ambush on our courts. NOM bludgeoned the very foundation of the American jurisprudence court system on Election night. We urge you to condemn the National Organization for Marriage and its allies for this type of dangerous and unprecedented attack on an independent judiciary. We ask you to remind Americans that a judiciary attacked and brought down by such biased politics threatens our very democracy.   Add your name *Required fields * First Name: * Last Name: * Your Email: * ZIP / Postal Code: * Country: Choose a Country United States Canada Mexico Afghanistan Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia-Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory Brunei Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Cook Islands Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic East Timor Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands Faroe Islands Fiji Finland Former Czechoslovakia Former USSR France French Guyana French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Great Britain Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe (French) Guam (USA) Guatemala Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Ivory Coast (Cote D’Ivoire) Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Kuwait Kyrgyz Republic (Kyrgyzstan) Laos Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macau Macedonia Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique (French) Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Micronesia Moldavia Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands Netherlands Antilles New Caledonia (French) New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands North Korea Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Island Poland Polynesia (French) Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Reunion (French) Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Helena Saint Kitts & Nevis Anguilla Saint Lucia Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Tome and Principe Saint Vincent & Grenadines Samoa San Marino Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles S. Georgia & S. Sandwich Isls. Sierra Leone Singapore Slovak Republic Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Korea Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syria Tadjikistan Taiwan Tanzania Thailand Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom Uruguay USA Minor Outlying Islands Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Vietnam Virgin Islands (British) Virgin Islands (USA) Wallis and Futuna Islands Western Sahara Yemen Zaire Zambia Zimbabwe 1. Question – Not Required – Cell Phone (Join HRC’s Mobile Action Network):     We’d like to know more about our members and supporters. Please take a moment to answer these quick questions. Your information is strictly confidential; it will not be shared with any third parties. 2. Question – Not Required – Gender: Please select response Man Woman Woman/Transgender MTF Trans Man/Transgender FTM Genderqueer Prefer not to say 3. Question – Not Required – Sexual Orientation Please select response Lesbian Gay Bisexual Heterosexual/Straight Queer Other Prefer not to say You’ll receive email updates from HRC. You can unsubscribe at any time. Message Appalling actions Dear Human Rights Campaign, Dear Chief Justice John Roberts, As you know, three of Iowa’s Supreme Court justices lost their seats last week in the judicial retention election. All three were aggressively targeted by a cynical political campaign run by the Washington, D.C.-based National Organization for Marriage (NOM) and its allies because of a single, unanimous ruling. In 2009, the full court ruled that same-sex couples have a constitutional right to marry in Iowa. You might also know that the three justices, who faced a barrage of television ads, refused to mount a counter attack because of the message it might send to litigants who appear before them. The judicial retention election, established in 1962, was designed to address gross misconduct, not punish judges for one ruling. In fact, only four other judges have lost their seats and, until last Tuesday, none of them from the state’s highest court. NOM’s non-stop campaign made voters believe that ousting the justices would destroy same-sex marriage in Iowa. Of course, same-sex marriage remains law in Iowa and will not be impacted by whomever the new governor selects for the bench. In fact, NOM admits its Iowa campaign had nothing to do with Iowa. This one judicial retention election, the organization said, would “send a clear signal to the Supreme Court and other judges that they don’t have the right to make up the law out of thin air. If the people of Iowa…remove these judges, there will be reverberations throughout the country all the way to the United States Supreme Court.” This is clear intimidation meant to be heard hundreds and thousands of miles away from Waterloo, Des Moines or Dubuque. It’s meant to shatter judicial independence everywhere. The Iowa State Bar Association had determined that each of the three justices was “well qualified,” meaning all three “avoid undue personal observations or criticisms [and they] decide cases on the basis of applicable law and fact, not affected by outside influence.” This was nothing short of a political ambush on our courts. NOM bludgeoned the very foundation of the American jurisprudence court system on Election night. We urge you to condemn the National Organization for Marriage and its allies for this type of dangerous and unprecedented attack on an independent judiciary. We ask you to remind Americans that a judiciary attacked and brought down by such biased politics threatens our very democracy. Signed,

Maintainer: Human Rights Campaign (hrc@hrc.org)